How to interpret RWA data? Three key points help you penetrate the "asset packaging" to see if the assets are real → Is there custody, is there an audit, and is the linkage transparent? Check if the returns are stable → What are the sources of returns, the cycle, and are the records clear? Check if it is used on-chain → Is it for display or can it be traded, borrowed, and truly circulated? True RWA is not about shouting "chain reform," but about making real assets truly enter the Web3 financial system, achieving "verifiable, yield-generating, and usable."
RWA (Real World Assets) brings real-world assets (bonds, real estate, credit, notes) onto the chain, but it differs from purely on-chain projects; it has a three-stage structure of "off-chain assets - on-chain mapping - on-chain trading." You need to look at on-chain data, but more importantly, you must be able to judge whether the underlying assets are real, transparent, and in use. Next, let's take a look at the key data of RWA projects.
1. The "truth" and "scale" of asset linkage:#
The foundation of RWA is: does this "token" on the chain have a real-world asset backing it? Otherwise, it is "air RWA."
What to look for?
On-chain issuance vs off-chain asset scale: If the project claims to have issued $100 million in bonds, how much is on-chain? Can the off-chain custody information be verified?
Custody address/institution transparency: Is it clearly stated where the assets are held, and is it regulated off-chain?
Audit or off-chain proof frequency: Is there a third-party audit every month/quarter? Is there regular updating of reserve proof?
Asset category proportion: Is it bonds? Real estate? Notes? Assess risk based on structure.
Recommended tools:
Real World Assets or RWA.xyz: The strongest RWA data platform on the internet.
Project official website/white paper: Check asset custodians and underlying structures.
DeFiLlama: Has some RWA asset project tracking panels.
Project on-chain contract analysis tools: Such as Etherscan, to check issuance contracts and balances.
Tip: The more on-chain data there is, the more transparent the project is; the more complex the off-chain assets, the more you need to check if they are protected by "regulation, audit, and custody."
2. The "true blood generation" of income streams:#
Having assets does not mean having income. The significance of RWA is: to create stable income from real assets and return it to on-chain users. RWA that does not generate income is just "debt on the chain."
What to look for?
Actual frequency and number of on-chain income distributions: How often are returns distributed? Can specific records be found?
Is the annualized yield (APY) compatible with the asset type: If the bond annualized yield is 15%, then it is definitely not RWA.
Distribution of income sources: Is it rent? Interest? Note spreads? Is it explained?
Are there any default records or interrupted income history: An interruption in income indicates potential issues off-chain, requiring investigation into the reasons for the break.
Recommended tools:
RWA.xyz: Income records, yield rankings.
Dune dashboards (such as Centrifuge, Maple, etc. RWA project data dashboards).
Project on-chain income distribution contracts + Token Tracker.
Follow official Medium/blog: See if income disclosures are updated regularly.
Tip: Income must match the asset type in "logical compatibility, stable cycles, and traceability"; otherwise, it is a Ponzi trap of inflated promises.
3. Usage rate and demand side: Is it "truly used" on-chain?#
Many RWA projects become "idle" after moving assets onto the chain, with no trading or collateralization, ultimately becoming "glass exhibits on the chain."
What to look for?
Total value locked (TVL) on-chain: Are assets being collateralized, staked, or lent?
Number of active users and transaction volume: How many users are actually participating in RWA asset-related operations?
Are assets being used as collateral: Can they be used in lending protocols? Are they supported by Aave/Maple, etc.?
Liquidity in the secondary market: Are they traded on DEX/OTC platforms? What is the depth?
Recommended tools:
DeFiLlama: Check RWA protocol TVL rankings.
RWA.xyz: Track on-chain use cases of various projects.
Dune: Analyze project liquidity, transactions, and user retention.
Community/governance forums of various projects: Observe real usage feedback.
Reminder: An RWA asset that no one uses and cannot be traded is just "dead data" that has been costly to move onto the chain.
Summary: How to interpret RWA data? Three key points help you penetrate the "asset packaging."#
Check if the assets are real → Is there custody, is there an audit, and is the linkage transparent?
Check if the returns are stable → What are the sources of returns, the cycle, and are the records clear?
Check if it is used on-chain → Is it for display or can it be traded, borrowed, and truly circulated?
True RWA is not about shouting "chain reform," but about making real assets truly enter the Web3 financial system, achieving "verifiable, yield-generating, and usable."
Welcome to join the community
Welcome to join the community WeChat: BQ221858
Welcome to follow Weibo: @QuarkMing202
Welcome to follow Twitter: @xian202766693