How to interpret SocialFi data? Three core indicators help you distinguish between genuine excitement and hype.
User behavior and interaction retention → Check for "real social interaction."
On-chain content transactions and tips → Check if the content has "real value."
Economic models and incentive design → Check if the system can be "truly sustainable."
Truly promising SocialFi is not a bustling "mutual following platform," but a genuinely valuable exchange and content monetization mechanism within an on-chain social network.
The core of SocialFi is "social + finance." Many projects appear to have a huge user base and skyrocketing popularity, but when you break down the data, you'll find it's all about mutual following, volume manipulation, and short-term exploitation. What data truly reflects user quality, content value, and economic sustainability? Let's break down the project data of SocialFi together.
1. Looking at popularity? Better to look at "real activity."#
User count is an entry point, but we can't just look at "registered users" or "post volume." The value of SocialFi lies in community activity and content influence, not merely in the number of users.
What to look for?
Daily active users/Weekly active users (DAU/WAU): Measure the scale of genuinely active users.
Content output frequency: Total posts per day vs. daily new user count.
Interaction rate (comments/likes/shares): Average interactions per piece of content.
User retention rate: Retention curves for the next day, 7 days, and 30 days to assess platform stickiness.
Recommended tools:
DappRadar: View user counts, transaction numbers, interaction frequency, etc.
Footprint Analytics: Conduct retention analysis and behavioral mapping.
Dune Analytics: Create dashboards for interaction rates, content publishing trends, etc.
Tip: Don't be misled by slogans like "XX project has over a million users." Break down the data: Are they "creators" who post daily, or just "users" who come to recruit a few people for airdrops and then leave?
2. On-chain interaction data: Is the content being "truly read" and "truly used"?#
SocialFi is not just about posting; its content can be monetized. Users post content, tip content, and purchase influence—these actions are traceable on-chain, and where there is data, there is truth.
What to look for?
Content tipping/transaction counts: Are people paying for content?
Circulation of NFT content: Has the content turned into an asset that circulates?
Are interaction behaviors recorded on-chain: Are likes and follows genuine transactions, or are they centralized backend fake data?
Repetition of tipping/sharing addresses: Is it all reliant on internal cycles of fake users inflating data?
Recommended tools:
Zerion / DeBank: Check specific wallets' content interaction history.
Nansen (paid): Identify if "smart addresses" frequently participate in content transactions.
Dune: View data dashboards for content transaction frequency, tipping models, etc.
Tip: Whether content can be monetized is a core indicator of whether SocialFi possesses "content financial value." Monetizable content ≠ volume manipulation; it means there are real people "paying for creation."
3. Social economic model: Is there positive incentive design?#
Most SocialFi projects will issue tokens and create reputation systems, but are these incentive mechanisms designed to "encourage quality content" or to "encourage mutual following and support"? The key lies in the design of the economic model.
What to look for?
Token issuance logic: Is it "more content equals more tokens," or is it "influence + interaction quality" that determines rewards?
Token utility: What can tokens be used for? Can they be used for platform appreciation, upgrades, or content publishing?
Anti-bot mechanisms: Are there measures against volume manipulation, fake accounts, and exploiters?
Pathways for content on-chain and NFTization: Can content be verified, traded, and collateralized?
Recommended tools:
Official whitepapers + TokenUnlocks: Check token release and utility.
Messari: Analyze the economic design of well-known SocialFi projects.
Dune dashboards: Analyze the coordination of data on-chain interactions and token issuance rhythms.
Tip: If a platform only rewards "posting more" or "having more followers" without any "content quality assessment" mechanisms, that system will quickly collapse, leading to poor quality, rapid inflation, and user attrition.
Summary: How to interpret SocialFi data? Three core indicators help you distinguish between genuine excitement and hype.#
User behavior and interaction retention → Check for "real social interaction."
On-chain content transactions and tips → Check if the content has "real value."
Economic models and incentive design → Check if the system can be "truly sustainable."
Truly promising SocialFi is not a bustling "mutual following platform," but a genuinely valuable exchange and content monetization mechanism within an on-chain social network.
Welcome to join the community
Join the community WeChat: BQ221858
Follow us on Weibo: @QuarkMing202
Follow us on Twitter: @xian202766693